Legal Opinion
City of Rock Hill v. Thompson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 11, 2002No. 25429PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BURNETT:
Petitioner City of Rock Hill (City) petitions the Court to issue a writ of mandamus “requiring the Honorable Jane Pittman Modla, Judge of the City of Rock Hill Municipal Court, and all lower courts in which the issue may arise, to apply 1998 Acts 434 as corrected by the Code Commissioner and presently enrolled with the Secretary of State, as the law of the State of South Carolina.” The writ is denied.
BACKGROUND
On October 21, 2000, Respondent Michael Dean Thompson (Thompson) was arrested by City’s Police Department for driving under the influence in violation of South Carolina…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- A. Olinick & Sons, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Dempster Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. A. Olinick & Sons v. Honorable Matthew T. Abruzzo, United States District Judge, Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Redmond v. Lexington County School District No. FourSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009