Legal Opinion

State v. McKnight

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 22, 1985PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion to suppress evidence that was seized pursuant to an allegedly defective search warrant. The State petitions for a writ of mandamus or supersedeas to allow admission of the evidence. The State asserts the suppression order significantly impairs the prosecution of its case. Because neither mandamus nor supersedeas is an appropriate form of relief in this case, we deny the State’s petition.

We take this opportunity, however, to address respondents’ contention that the suppression order is not directly appealable. A pre-trial order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. AbdullahCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. HuntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API