Marriage of Kremer v. Kremer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRK, Judge.
In this marital-dissolution appeal, appellant-father argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by granting sole physical custody of the child to respondent-mother; (2) erred by not addressing mother’s relocation to Iowa under Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 3; and (3) abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial. We conclude that the district court was not required to analyze whether mother’s relocation to Iowa is in the child’s best interests under Minn.Stat. § 518.175, subd. 3, because (1) that statute applies only to a parent’s relocation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Paternity of BJHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016