Legal Opinion

Marriage of Kremer v. Kremer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 2013No. A12-0699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRK, Judge.

In this marital-dissolution appeal, appellant-father argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by granting sole physical custody of the child to respondent-mother; (2) erred by not addressing mother’s relocation to Iowa under Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 3; and (3) abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial. We conclude that the district court was not required to analyze whether mother’s relocation to Iowa is in the child’s best interests under Minn.Stat. § 518.175, subd. 3, because (1) that statute applies only to a parent’s relocation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. In Re Paternity of BJHCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API