Legal Opinion

Wheatland Tube Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 45 to 50PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The claimant, Harry O. Schuster, an employe of Wheatland Tube Company, worked until June 29, 1956, at which time the employer’s plant shut down for an announced vacation period of one week, July 2, 1956 through July 8, 1956. For economic reasons, the claimant’s department remained closed at the end of the vacation shutdown for an additional two weeks due to lack of work.

On June 29, 1956, claimant received three weeks vacation pay in the amount of $342.62, one week of which was specifically paid for the announced vacation shutdown period of July 2, 1956 through July 8,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kanner v. Best Markets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Santus Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Hoenstine Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Romig Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Franceschi Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Appel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Susquehanna Collieries Division of the M. A. Hanna Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Employment Security Commission v. WattsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API