Legal Opinion

Romig Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1957No. Appeal, No. 161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case. Claimant, Charles F. Eomig, was denied benefits by the bureau, the referee, and the Board of Review for the period during which his vacation pay was allocated to his unemployment. He has appealed to this Court.1

The facts as found by the referee and adopted by the board are not in dispute. The appeal concerns a matter of law.

On May 12, 1955, claimant was laid off by his employer, the American Window Glass Company, because certain repairs had to be made to its plant. On May 13, 1955, claimant applied for benefits. Prior thereto,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santus Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Vincenti v. KammerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Hoenstine Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Community Country Day School v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Wheatland Tube Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. Sheraton-Midcontinent Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API