Legal Opinion
Appel v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 6, 1989No. Appeals Nos. 1630 C.D. 1988, 1629 C.D. 1988, 1627 C.D. 1988, 1626 C.D. 1988, 1631 C.D. 1988, 1628 C.D. 1988, 48 C.D. 1988, 47 C.D. 1988, 45 C.D. 1988, 46 C.D. 1988, 44 C.D. 1988, 832 C.D. 1988, 838 C.D. 1988, 837 C.D. 1988, 836 C.D. 1988, 835 C.D. 1988, 839 C.D. 1988, 834 C.D. 1988 and 833 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Smith,
Joseph R. Appel (Claimant), representative claimant,1 appeals from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits pursuant to Sections 4(h) *636and 404(d)(ii) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law.2 The Board’s decision is affirmed.
Claimant, a member of the United Steelworkers of America, Local No. 1779 (Union), was employed by Pittsburgh Forgings Company (Employer). According to prior practice, Employer posted a notice of vacation shutdown on June 15, 1987 indicating that the Coraopolis plant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dennis v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Iceland Products v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Libbey-Owens-Ford Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Praskac v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Baran v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Baran v. UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Booth v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994