Legal Opinion
Susquehanna Collieries Division of the M. A. Hanna Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 1960No. Appeals, Nos. 1, 2 and 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The three appeals before us involve claims for unemployment compensation during a vacation period.
Roman S. Piestrak, Marlin J. Marose, and Charles Whary, along with a number of others whose claims are dependent upon these cases, were employed by the *244Susquehanna Collieries Division of the M. A. Hanna Company.
In accordance with the collective bargaining agreement between the employer and the United Mine Workers of America, the claimants’ union, the collieries at which the claimants were employed closed for vacation between June 28 and July 12, 1958. The claimants received…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Farmers-Kissinger Market House Co., Inc. v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- General Electric Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turtzer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goodfellow v. RundleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goodfellow v. RundleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Turtzer v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987