Legal Opinion
Employment Security Commission v. Watts
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 25, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
This unemployment compensation case involves a determination of the circumstances under which unemployment benefits, in addition to vacation pay, may be received for a period of temporary lay-off.
The claimant Carl Watts, an employee of the Bond Crown & Cork Company, was temporarily laid off, as the result of seasonal business fluctuation, on January 27, 1967. By February 14, 1967, he was back on the job. Watts applied for unemployment compensation on February 7. Two days after the application, Watts exercised the option in his employment contract enabling him to receive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Allen v. Maryland Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Hoenstine Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Moore v. State of Delaware Unemploy. Comp. Com'nSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Labor Ex Rel. Commons v. Green Giant Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
- General Motors Corporation v. CrishockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- General Motors Corp. v. Local 435 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988