Legal Opinion

Stern v. Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2012No. 20100339PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

{ 1 The Point of the Mountain Aqueduct is a sixty-inch diameter pipeline that runs along the historic Draper Canal and transports culinary water to Salt Lake City and other cities in the Salt Lake Valley. Plaintiffs in this case are homeowners who asserted claims challenging Metropolitan Water District's construction of the aqueduct as exceeding the scope of its real property rights along the canal route. The district court granted summary judgment for the Water District. We affirm that decision in most respects, but reverse and remand for further proceedings…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Huggins v. Castle Estates Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Torian v. CraigUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Keith v. Mountain Resorts Development, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Toscano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Baker v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Wilberg v. HyattCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API