Legal Opinion
MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1998No. 89674PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 May residents of a former school district successfully bring a declaratory judgment action to invalidate an annexation election held thirty years earlier? They may not. We affirm the District Court’s judgment in favor of the Defendant existing school district.
¶2 Plaintiffs are 317 residents in Oklahoma City School District 1-89 residing in the former Arcadia School District 1-5. In 1996 the Plaintiffs filed suit in District Court seeking a declaratory judgment that two elections in 1966 annexing their Arcadian district to the Oklahoma City district were void.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Shaw v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Dowell v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.