Toscano v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a class action brought by Utah landowners who assert that the imposition of a recreational trail on their land constitutes an uncompensated taking under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs contend that, but for the Surface Transportation Board’s (“STB”) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail Use pursuant to section 8(d) of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) (2006) (the “Trails Act”), they would have had full use of the surface of their property, because the easements supporting the railroad line would have been…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- LOVERIDGE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
- LOVERIDGE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.