Legal Opinion

Toscano v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 20, 2012No. 08-910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is a class action brought by Utah landowners who assert that the imposition of a recreational trail on their land constitutes an uncompensated taking under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs contend that, but for the Surface Transportation Board’s (“STB”) issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail Use pursuant to section 8(d) of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) (2006) (the “Trails Act”), they would have had full use of the surface of their property, because the easements supporting the railroad line would have been…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. LOVERIDGE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  5. LOVERIDGE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API