Legal Opinion

Hoiles v. Alioto

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2006No. 05-1376PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

This appeal arises out of a contingent fee agreement (the “Fee Agreement”) entered into by Plaintiff-Appellee Timothy Hoiles, a resident of Colorado, and Defendant-Appellant Joseph Alioto, an attorney licensed to practice law in California. Hoiles hired Alioto to assist him in selling stock he owned in a private, family-owned media company, Freedom Communications, Inc. (“Freedom”). Approximately two years after the parties entered into the Fee Agreement, Freedom was recapitalized, enabling Hoiles to exchange his shares in the company for cash. Hoiles…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. R.W. Beck, Inc. v. E3 Consulting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Bouchillon v. SAME Deutz-Fahr, GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
  4. COPIC Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
  5. Alioto v. HoilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API