Legal Opinion
Niemi v. Lasshofer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 4, 2014No. 13-1256PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
John Niemi, Robert Naegele, III, and Jesper Parnevik (“Plaintiffs” or “Appellees”) claim that Erwin Lasshofer and three companies affiliated with him (the “Lasshofer Defendants” or “Appellants”), along with other cq-conspirators, perpetrated a fraudulent financing scheme that caused the collapse of Plaintiffs’ large-scale real estate development project in Breckenridge, Colorado. The district court rejected the Lasshofer Defendants’ challenges to standing, jurisdiction, and venue, and entered a default judgment of approximately $185 million in favor of Plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Tripodi v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.