R.W. Beck, Inc. v. E3 Consulting, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
R.W. Beck, Inc., and E3 Consulting, LLC, both providé consulting services and produce independent-engineer reports used to obtain financing for energy-related projects. Reports prepared by both Beck and E3 have contained sections entitled “Principal Considerations and Assumptions Used in the Projection of Operating Results.” ApltApp., Vol. I at 21 (report prepared by Beck); id. at 25 (report prepared by E3). Beck sued E3 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado because language in that section of an E3 report repeated verbatim much of the language…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Briarpatch Limited, L.P., Gerard F. Rubin v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., Michael Medavoy, Geisler Roberdeau, Inc., Terence MalickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Lynn Noyes v. Kelly Services, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Felkins v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Fields v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Aspen Technology, Inc. v. M3 Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Collegesource, Inc. v. Academyone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.