Legal Opinion
COPIC Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 10, 2011No. 1:09-cr-00041PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, Senior District Judge.
This case is before me on the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 293), filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Plaintiff COPIC Insurance Company’s (“COPIC”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim (ECF No. 291). 1 The motions are both opposed by the other party. Upon review of the parties’ filings, I conclude oral argument is not required. For the reasons that follow, Wells Fargo’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part and Plaintiffs motion will be denied.
Backgro…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Farmington Hills Employees Retirement System v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Agile Safety Variable Fund, L.P. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Continental Casualty Company v. Cintas Corporation No. 2District Court, D. Colorado · 2022