State v. Kirkeby
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In this criminal action, the state appeals the trial court’s pretrial order suppressing drug evidence obtained during a consensual search of defendant’s person during a traffic stop. ORS 138.060(1)(c). The issue presented to us is whether the police officer’s request for consent to search defendant constituted an unlawful extension of the traffic stop in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Defendant cross-appeals the court’s pretrial ruling that denied his motion to exclude evidence of a field test of drugs that were discovered as a result of the search. We affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. GomesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. HuggettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.