Legal Opinion
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 7, 2020No. Consol. 19-00056PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20-4 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI 9(7,&$5(7$ù Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge Plaintiff, AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Consol. Court No. 19-00056 et al., PUBLIC VERSION Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, et al., Defendant-Intervenors, and BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI 9(7,&$5(7$ù, Consolidated Defendant- Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [In an action challenging certain of Commerce’s administrative determinations in an antidumping duty investigation, Commerce’s Amended Final…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Itochu Building Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hyundai Steel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Dong-A Steel Co. v. United StatesPublic version posted 10/01/2020.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Ellwood City Forge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.