Legal Opinion

Fiske v. Niagara Fire Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10643PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover on an assigned contract of insurance, based upon the following enumerated perils insured against and the exceptions thereto:

“(c) Theft, robbery or pilferage, excepting by' any person or persons in the Assured’s household or in the Assured’s service or employment, whether the theft, robbery or pilferage occur during 'the hours of such service or employment or not, and excepting the wrongful conversion, embezzlement, or secretion by a mortgagor or vendee in possession under mortgage, conditional sale or lease agreement, and excepting in any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. People v. ShaughnessyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Buxton v. International Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Delafield v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Walzer & GabrielsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Nugent v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SalyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Boggs v. Motors Insurance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API