Legal Opinion

People v. Rae

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1885No. 20,062PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sacramento, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, under an information filed by the district attorney charging him with that offense. What he did was this: In company with a confederate, who passed by the name of Turner, he boarded an emigrant train of the Central Pacific Bail-road Company, and engaged the prosecuting witness, who was a passenger on the train, in conversation. He represented himself to be a dealer in furs, and said he was traveling on the emigrant train because of the convenience it afforded him of stopping along the route for the transaction of his business. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loomis v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Crum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. DelbosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. BartgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. Von BadenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API