Legal Opinion

Tuetken v. Tuetken

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2010No. W2008-00274-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, C.J.

in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ, joined.

We granted appeal in this case to determine the trial court’s scope of review of the parties’ arbitration award. After thoroughly reviewing the record, we conclude that the parties entered into binding arbitration governed by the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act (“TUAA”) and reaffirm our holding in Pugh’s Lawn Landscape Co., Inc. v. Jayeon Development Corp., 320 S.W.3d 252, 254 (Tenn.2010), that the judicial review of an arbitration award is confined to the grounds enumerated in the TUAA. The…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hawk v. HawkTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Berryhill v. RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kendrick v. ShoemakeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kevin Turner v. Stephanie D. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re BabyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pugh's Lawn Landscape Co. v. Jaycon Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Glassman, Edwards, Wyatt, Tuttle & Cox, P.C. v. B. J. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API