Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Langan
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1994No. Nos. C-930193, C-930194PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Peter Langan, appeals from the judgments of the Hamilton County Municipal Court in which he was convicted, following a jury trial, of two violations of Cincinnati Municipal Code 708-37 (“CMC 708-37”), 1 which prohibits the possession of semiautomatic firearms and detachable magazines of certain capacities. Appellant was sentenced to serve one hundred twenty-one days on each charge, with the terms to run concurrently. The trial court, however, credited appellant for the one hundred twenty-one days that he had served in pretrial confinement. Additionally,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Akron v. RasdanOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Citizens for a Safer Community v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.