Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Rasdan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1995No. 16972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant and cross-appellee, the city of Akron, appeals from a judgment of the Akron Municipal Court finding the knife provision in Akron Codified Ordinances (“ACO”) 137.02(A) (“Akron knife provision”) unconstitutional on its face. While we agree with the judgment of the municipal court and, therefore, affirm, we do not agree with the municipal court’s conclusion that the Akron knife provision is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Rather, because the Akron knife provision criminalizes an unreasonable amount of inherently innocent activity, and because prohibiting so much…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Rocky River v. SalehOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. City of Elyria v. RoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. City of Cleveland v. SmithCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API