Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Baskin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2004No. C-030864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winkler, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cincinnati, in a single assignment of error, appeals the trial court’s judgment of October 23, 2003, granting defendantappellee Colt Lee Baskin’s motion to dismiss a firearms-possession charge under Cincinnati Municipal Code 708-37 (“CMC 708-37”). While the sole five-page transcript of a hearing on October 23, 2003, suggests that Baskin had filed a motion to dismiss, and the city a memorandum in opposition, the record transmitted to this court includes neither. The transcript also alludes to a previous hearing on this matter, but…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Klein v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. City of Niles v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lima v. StepletonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API