City of Cincinnati v. Baskin
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cincinnati, in a single assignment of error, appeals the trial court’s judgment of October 23, 2003, granting defendantappellee Colt Lee Baskin’s motion to dismiss a firearms-possession charge under Cincinnati Municipal Code 708-37 (“CMC 708-37”). While the sole five-page transcript of a hearing on October 23, 2003, suggests that Baskin had filed a motion to dismiss, and the city a memorandum in opposition, the record transmitted to this court includes neither. The transcript also alludes to a previous hearing on this matter, but…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Klein v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Ohio Ass'n of Private Detective Agencies, Inc. v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Niles v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Lima v. StepletonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cincinnati v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 2005