Halkes v. Douglas & Lomason Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■Bushnell, J.
Thirty-three plaintiffs, who were later joined by ten others, all employees of defendant company, sought the aid of a court of equity in enforcing their claims for various balances due as wages. The bill of complaint, filed February 2,1932, prayed for the appointment of a receiver under the provisions of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 15930, 15931, and an accounting. On February 6, 1932, an order to show cause why a receiver should not be appointed was heard and denied. A stipulation between the attorneys for the parties was filed on May 5th, by which it was agreed that the- equity court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Salisbury v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henkel v. HenkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance v. R. H. Hidey, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Bajorek v. KurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re Petition of WernickeMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- McCall v. Hamilton County Farmers Telephone Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.