Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance v. R. H. Hidey, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentEdwards, J.
At issue in the pages which follow is a long debated procedural reform. To replace multiple pleadings and. multiple trials, the bar has long advocated liberal joinder rules where the causes of action possessed by a number of plaintiffs (as here) arose out of the same occurrence or occurrences and the defendant or defendants were the same. The Federal courts followed English precedent and pioneered with signal success in this field and with the overwhelming approval of the bar. This opinion suggests that Michigan follow the example set (which in nowise controls us) by reasonable interpretation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Guardian Depositors Corp. v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Lawrence v. American Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Greenlees v. Owen Ames Kimball Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Goodrich v. WallerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dix v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Grigg v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Western Insurance CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Oakwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jackson v. TroganMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.