Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Calendar 36,277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a bill in chancery by- a large number of separate owners of land to recover special paving assessments, paid by them individually, on an assessment held void in Miller v. City of Detroit, 244 Mich. 38. Among others, defendants, pleaded the defenses of the statute of limitations and ade quate remedy at law. The court entered an order transferring the case to the law side of the court for trial.

The remedy to recover illegal taxes paid is in assumpsit for money had and received. Blanchard v. City of Detroit, 253 Mich. 491, does not change the remedy. The bill there alleged a cause for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Halkes v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Paul v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Salisbury v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Craig v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API