Bajorek v. Kurtz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.
The question at issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs are entitled to join in an action for damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained by their respective properties because of alleged wrongful conduct on the part of the defendants. The declaration, which was filed August 23, 1949, alleges that the named plaintiffs are the owners of record, or purchasers on land contract, of lots in -certain subdivisions in the city of Detroit, and that they have used their respective lots for residential purposes for a number of years past. The pleading further alleges that defendant Kurtz is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Goodrich v. WallerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Gumienny v. HessMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Gilmer v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dix v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Palmer Park Theatre Co. v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Grigg v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Goeke v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance v. R. H. Hidey, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.