Legal Opinion

People v. Watkins; People v. Pullen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2012No. Docket 142031 and 142751PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

These consolidated cases involve MCL 768.27a(l), which provides in relevant part that “in a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of committing a listed offense against a minor, evidence that the defendant committed another listed offense against a minor is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.”1 We hold that MCL 768.27a irreconcilably conflicts with MRE 404(b), which bars the admission of other-acts evidence for the purpose of showing a defendant’s propensity to commit similar acts, and that the statute prevails over the court rule…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. People v. SollowayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. GainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. BassMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. DuenazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API