Dowling v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
At petitioner’s trial for various offenses arising out of a bank robbery, testimony was admitted under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, relating to an alleged crime *344that the defendant had previously been acquitted of committing. We conclude that neither the Double Jeopardy Clause nor the Due Process Clause barred the use of this testimony.
I
On the afternoon of July 8, 1985, a man wearing a ski mask and armed with a small pistol robbed the First Pennsylvania Bank in Frederiksted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, taking over $7,000 in cash from a bank teller, approximately $5,000 in cash…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,429 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
1,424 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.