Legal Opinion

Dowling v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 17, 1990No. 88-6025PublishedCited by 1,429 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

At petitioner’s trial for various offenses arising out of a bank robbery, testimony was admitted under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, relating to an alleged crime *344that the defendant had previously been acquitted of committing. We conclude that neither the Double Jeopardy Clause nor the Due Process Clause barred the use of this testimony.

I

On the afternoon of July 8, 1985, a man wearing a ski mask and armed with a small pistol robbed the First Pennsylvania Bank in Frederiksted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, taking over $7,000 in cash from a bank teller, approximately $5,000 in cash…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,429 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990

1,424 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API