Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter v. Cross, A/K/A Bobo Walter v. Cross, United States of America v. Jules C. Melograne

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 18, 2002No. 00-3466, 00-3488PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Jules C. Melograne and Walter V. “Bo” Cross conspired to fix hundreds of cases in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. After a trial in the District Court, a jury convicted them of conspiring to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1341, 1 and conspiring to violate Pennsylvania citizens’ right to a fair and impartial trial in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. 2 They appealed, and in United States v. Cross, 128 F.3d 145 (3d Cir.1997) (Cross I), we affirmed their § 241 convictions but reversed their § 1341…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by224 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Judge v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API