Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Chaney
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 1, 1992No. C-91-3532 SBA (ENE)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ALLSTATE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT •
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) filed the instant diversity jurisdiction action against defendants Sylvester L. Chaney, Lillie M. Chaney (collectively “the Chaneys”), and Karen Matson, seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the Chaneys in an underlying state court action. The parties are now before the Court on plaintiff Allstate’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. After having read the papers submitted and considered the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- George R. Chamberlain, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- American States Insurance v. Canyon CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Aluise v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BrewerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Boggs v. Great Northern InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.