Wutchumna v. Water Co. v. Ragle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County denying defendants’ motion to vacate the original judgment and to amend its conclusions of law and judgment, and from a portion of the judgment. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to enjoin defend ants from diverting any portion of the waters of a certain water-ditch known as the Wutchumna Ditch, situated in Tulare County, to all of which plaintiff claimed to be the owner. By their answer defendants as an affirmative defense
to said action and as a basis of their right to divert water from said ditch, averred facts under which they claimed that as early as 1877 their predecessor in interest in • the lands described in their answer had, under an agreement with the Pioneer Canal Company, to whose rights in said canal plaintiff succeeded, acquired a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- New Mexico Products Co. v. New Mexico Power Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.