Waterford I. Dist. v. Turlock I. Dist.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by appellants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff enjoining the defendants from interfering with the flow of sixty second-feet of water from the Tuolumne River into the canal of the Modesto Irrigation District and to restrain them from interfering in any way with the diversion of said water by plaintiff, the said sixty second-feet of water having been acquired by the plaintiff from the Sierra and San Francisco Power Company, a corporation, under a contract dated January 14, 1919.
The respondent has incorporated into its brief the written opinion of the Honorable G. W.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Pfeiffer v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Salt Lake City v. East Jordan Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.