Tuttle v. Campbell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Some time in 1882 William A. Tuttle^ who is the plaintiff's husband, engaged in the business of selling drugs and medicines at Williamston, Ingham county. He occupied a store which belonged to his wife, Flora B. Tuttle.
jljj. March of 1884 domestic dissensions caused a separation between Tuttle and his wife, and she left him and determined upon filing a bill of complaint to obtain a divorce from the bonds of matrimony. To save litigation over the question of alimony, he agreed to give her *655$1,000, in full of all claims against him, to be paid when she obtained a decree for divorce, to secure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pease v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Welch v. SackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Bearce v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Fiquet v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Evans v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hochstetler v. GraberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Braithwaite v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.