Legal Opinion

Sias v. Village of Reed City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Osceola. (McMahon, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $400 for injuries received by stepping into a hole in a defective sidewalk. No question is raised but that the proof showed that the sidewalk was defective, and the appellant raises but two questions. It is claimed, first, that there was error in the admission of testimony bearing upon the question of damages, and, second, that error was committed in refusing to instruct the jury as matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

1. At the time of the injury the plaintiff was engaged in cooking for a lunch counter at Eeed City, at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Kendall v. City of AlbiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  3. McKeigue v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Lowell v. Township of WatertownMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Styles v. Village of DecaturMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Pawlicki v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Urtel v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Lorenz v. SowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API