Legal Opinion

McKeigue v. City of Janesville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1887PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Hoch County. The principal facets are stated in the opinion. The sixth assignment of error there referred to was based upon the ruling of the court below in permitting the plaintiff to prove that' after the death of the mother the younger children were entirely supported by their older brothers and sister.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Hoch County. The principal facets are stated in the opinion. The sixth assignment of error there referred to was based upon the ruling of the court below in permitting the plaintiff to prove that' after the death of the mother the younger children were entirely supported by their older brothers and sister. There was a verdict for the plaihtiif for $1,750. A motion for a new trial was denied, and from the judgment entered on the verdict the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTatloe, J.

This action was brought to recover damages of the appellant for causing the death of Bridget McKeigue by the negligence of the city in not keeping in repair a cross-walk in said city. The claim made by the respondent is that on the 14th day of April, 1888, Bridget McKeigue, *52while crossing one of the public streets in said city on a dark and rainy evening, was violently thrown down by reason of a defect- in. the cross-walk where the walk crossed the gutter; that she was greatly injured by her fall, and that, by reason of such injury, she became sick, and so remained until her death, which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Randall v. Northwestern Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mulcairns v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Quaife v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Calvert v. Springfield Electric Light & Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Prouty v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Crouse v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API