Legal Opinion
Moll v. Abbott Laboratories
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1992No. Docket 115542, 115550PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, P.J.
Defendants Eli Lilly & Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., and others separately appeal by leave granted from a circuit court order denying their motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). Their appeals have been consolidated, and we affirm.
In this pharmaceutical products liability action, plaintiff Jean Moll alleges that as a result of her in útero exposure to the prescription drug diethylstilbestrol (des) she suffers from an incompetent cervix, resulting in a probable inability to carry a fetus to term. Michael Moll alleges a loss of consortium. Defendants are manufacturers…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Detroit Board of Education v. Celotex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Doe Ex Rel. Smith v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
- Roseville Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.