Legal Opinion
Roseville Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. United States Gypsum Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 15, 1992No. 2:91-cv-72626PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
This is a products liability action filed by plaintiff Roseville Plaza Limited Partnership against defendant United States Gypsum Company. 1 Before the Court are defendant’s motion to dismiss based upon the economic loss doctrine; motion for summary judgment based upon expiration of the statute of limitations or, in the alternative, for a separate statute of limitations trial; motion for summary judgment of plaintiffs restitution claim; and motion for summary judgment based upon lack of evidence to support plaintiff’s essential allegations. 2 The Court has…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Keene Corp. v. HallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Farm Credit Bank v. United States Mineral Products Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1994
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,981 Roseville Plaza Limited Partnership v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.