Legal Opinion
Branker v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1997No. 96 Civ. 9223(RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”) and William C. Steere Jr. (“Steere”) have moved for summary judgment in this action brought by plaintiff Maureen Branker (“Branker”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y. City Admin. Code § 8-502, and the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Butler v. New York Health & Racquet ClubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Cully v. Milliman & Robertson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- McCormack v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Laramee v. Jewish Guild for the BlindDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.