Legal Opinion
Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 1, 2000No. 99-74339PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Laverne Kulling, Richard A. Beal, and William A. Scheib brought suit in this Court on September 3, 1999, alleging that Plaintiffs Beal and Scheib and Plaintiff Kulling’s late husband, Carl G. Kulling, were unlawfully discharged from their employment with Defendant Toyoda Machinery U.S.A. Corporation (“Toyoda”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Defendant Grinders For Industry, Inc. (“GFI”), in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leland Wheeler v. City of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cicero v. Borg-Warner Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lopez v. Regents of UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Pueschel v. VenemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.