Hansler v. Mainka

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Joseph A. Hansler, sued ap-pellees, AM Corporation, and its president, Tony Mainka, for conversion. After a bench trial, the trial court entered a take-nothing judgment favorable to appellees. The trial court found, among other things, that limitations barred Hansler’s suit. On appeal, Hansler challenges the judgment in three points of error, and appellees raise one cross-point of error. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Pursuant to a “LEASE AGREEMENT” dated February 22, 1983, Hansler and Automated Services, Inc., leased to Mainka and ATM Corporation 1…