Legal Opinion

Dyson v. Olin Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1985No. C-3548PublishedCited by 366 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Justice.

The issue presented is whether the court of appeals, in disposing of the “insufficiency” point, erred in interpreting the elements of gross negligence as stated in Burk Royalty Co. v. Walls, 616 S.W.2d 911, 922 (Tex.1981). Darrell Dyson sued the Olin Corporation after suffering personal injuries when the vehicle he was driving collided with a crane (“cherry-picker”), which was owned and operated by Olin. The trial court, based on the jury’s verdict, rendered judgment in favor of Dyson and awarded actual and punitive damages. The court of appeals determined that there was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. International Armament Corp. v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Olin Corp. v. DysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Harmon v. Sohio Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by366 opinions

  1. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

361 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API