Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Phoenix Frozen Foods, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 6, 1994No. 13-92-691-CVPublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

Appellants, San Juana Gonzalez, et al., appeal the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment based on statute of limitations grounds. By a single point of error, appellants argue that the summary judgment against them was in error since they raised issues of material fact as to the exercise of due diligence in serving appellees with a citation. We affirm.

This is a personal injury ease. On September 8, 1989, San Juana Gonzalez and her fellow workers were exposed to chemicals at their place of employment, Phoenix Frozen Foods, Inc. Gonzalez…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gant v. DeLeonTexas Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Webster v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Keeton v. Carrasco, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Li v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Taylor v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API