Legal Opinion

Proulx v. Wells

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2007No. 06-0258PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the court of appeals held that limitations barred the plaintiffs suit because, as a matter of law, he was not diligent in serving the defendant with process. 186 S.W.3d 630, 631. We hold that the summary-judgment evidence failed to conclusively establish that the plaintiff did not exercise diligence in effecting service, and reverse the court of appeals’ judgment.

Denis Proulx filed this personal-injury suit against Michael Wells on May 2, 2003, shortly before the statute of limitations expired on May 21, 2003. Proulx’s process server, Brian Duffe, received the citation on May…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gant v. DeLeonTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Webster v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. Stockton Ex Rel. Stockton v. OffenbachTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Ashley v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mauricio v. Castro, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Frederick and Sandra Dunmore v. Chicago Title Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  5. Slagle v. Prickett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API