Legal Opinion

Webster v. Thomas

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 18, 1999No. 14-98-00533-CVPublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

Appellant, Penny A. Webster, appeals a summary judgment in favor of appellee, Larry Thomas, in which the trial judge found that Webster had not used due diligence in serving Thomas. We affirm the trial court judgment because, after waiting until the last day of the limitations period to file suit, Webster’s counsel allowed an additional four months and ten days to pass in which he failed to use due diligence to procure issuance of citation and service of citation.

THE CONTROVERSY

On May 8, 1995, Thomas rear-ended Webster’s car. Two years later, on May 8, 1997,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Proulx v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Carter v. MacFadyen, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Brown v. Shores, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Belleza-Gonzalez v. Villa, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Sharp v. Kroger Texas L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API