Legal Opinion
Glassman Const. Co., Inc. v. Maryland City Plaza, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 7, 1974No. Civ. 20428PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, Senior District Judge.
This is an action for the balance claimed to be due on a contract price and for the claimed value of extra work performed in the construction of a shopping center. Plaintiff, Glassman Construction Company, is a District of Columbia corporation, with its principal place of business in a state other than the State of Maryland. Defendant, Maryland City Plaza, Inc., is a Maryland corporation; and defendants, Herbert H. Haft and Gloria Haft, are the owners of Maryland City Plaza and are citizens of the State of Maryland.
This Court has jurisdiction in the matter under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Ray v. EuriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.