Legal Opinion · Dissent

Continental National Bank of Chicago v. Fleming

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1912No. Docket No. 8PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Delta; Cooper, J., presiding. Bill by the Continental National Bank of Chicago, Illinois, and Edward Hines Lumber Company against John C. Fleming, Cyrus A. Barker, the Garth Lumber & Shingle Company, and other defendants, for the foreclosure of a mortgage. From a decree for complainants, defendants the Garth Lumber & Shingle Company and Cyrus A. Barker appeal.

1DissentMoore, C. J.

The bill in this case was filed to foreclose a mortgage dated December 24,1907, given by the Garth Lumber & Shingle Company, by C. A. Barker, its president, and running to the complainants above named, and the Bank of D. Hammel & Son and the first State Bank of Petoskey, to secure the payment of the following notes: One to the Bank of D. Hammel & Son for $5,500; one to the First State Bank of Petoskey for $8,500; one to the Continental National Bank of Chicago for $20,000; one to the Edward Hines Lumber Company for $30,000. All of the notes bore even date with the mortgage. There was a trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Payne v. NewcombIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ammondson v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Green v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. George N. Fletcher & Sons v. Alpena Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Attorney General v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Vandervelde v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hillman's v. EM'N AL'S.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API