Pope v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Debtor and Creditor. Title. Interest and Usury. Actions. Administrators and Executors. Contracts. Evidence. Before Judge Willis. Taylor Superior Court. February Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
The action was by Pope against Marshall to recover money alleged to have been paid as usury. There was a *636verdict for the defendant, and a motion by the plaintiff for a new trial, which was overruled.
The undisputed facts are that, in January, 1882, Marshall either lent or paid to Pope’s brother, since deceased, a sum of money, took from him an absolute deed in fee simple, conveying certain real estate; also two rent notes and a written acknowledgment that he, the brother, held the premises under Marshall, as his tenant, and gave to him a bond conditioned to reconvey in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Buckingham v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Broach v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Hammond v. BuysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
3Cited by41 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- W. E. Daniel and E. A. Dillard v. The First National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- BankWest, Inc. v. OxendineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Mell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.