Legal Opinion

George N. Fletcher & Sons v. Alpena Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1904No. Calendar No. 20,355PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Mandamus by George N. Fletcher & Sons to compel Frank Emerick, circuit judge of Alpena county, to continue an injunction restraining the sale of certain bonds.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The relator is a stockholder in a corporation named the Alpena Portland Cement Company. A bill of complaint was filed by it, in which it was sought to restrain the sale of certain bonds by said cement company, and a preliminary injunction was issued as prayed. An. application to dissolve this injunction was heard, and tho court rendered, an opinion in which the facts found by him were stated, and an order made continuing but so modifying the injunction that the defendants might sell the bonds (which draw 6 per cent, interest) at a price not below 75 cents on the dollar. Thereupon this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Tennant v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Van Akin v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. MacKinnon v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Straus v. Elless Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Grove v. Great Northern Loan Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hallett v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Continental National Bank of Chicago v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lyle v. Cass Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API