Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Contract Purchase Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1950No. Docket 77, Calendar 44,095PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Pursuant to leave granted, plaintiff, attorney general of the State of Michigan, brought an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto against the Contract Purchase Corporation, a Michigan corporation. Plaintiff charged violations of the usury law, * the small loan act, † and the insurance code. ‡ Testimony was taken by deposition. Plaintiff asks that the defendant be ousted from its corporate franchise and enjoined from continuing its illegal practices.

Defendant, incorporated in 1933, has offices in several cities in Michigan. It engages in many fields of financial activity, including…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. People ex rel. Maybury v. Mutual Gas-Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Miner v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Diamond Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Souden v. SoudenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Carolina Industrial Bank v. MerrimonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API